Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 23:59

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
NASA withdraws support for conferences - SpaceNews
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
US Steel workers see hope of job security in deal with Japan’s Nippon - Financial Times
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Kanye West Shows Up At Sean 'Diddy' Combs’ Trial—And Quickly Leaves - Forbes
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why do some guys treat girls so badly?
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why COVID 'Razor Blade' Sore Throat Hurts So Bad - WebMD
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Winners, losers from NASCAR Cup race at Nashville won by Ryan Blaney - NBC Sports
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Walk your way to a sharper mind: How 40 minutes of walking boosts brain size - Times of India
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.